Tips til systematiske reviews

De følgende artikler er et godt sted at starte ift. processen i en systematic review

1. Aromataris, E. and A. Pearson (2014). "The systematic review: an overview." American Journal of Nursing 114(3): 53-58

This article is the first in a new series on systematic reviews from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time. This first installment provides a synopsis of the systematic review as a scientific exercise, one that influences health care decisions.

2. Stern, C., et al. (2014). "Developing the review question and inclusion criteria." American Journal of Nursing 114(4): 53-56

This article is the second in a new series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time. This article details the process of articulating a review question to guide the search for relevant studies and discusses how to define inclusion criteria for the study-selection phase of the review.

3. Aromataris, E. and D. Riitano (2014). "Systematic Reviews: Constructing a Search Strategy and Searching for Evidence." AJN The American Journal of Nursing 114(5): 49-56

This article is the third in a new series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review—one step at a time. This article details the major considerations surrounding search strategies and presents an example of a search using the PubMed platform (pubmed.gov).

4. Porritt, K., et al. (2014). "JBI's Systematic Reviews: Study selection and critical appraisal." American Journal of Nursing 114(6): 47-52

This article is the fourth in a series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to describe how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time. This article focuses on the study selection and critical appraisal steps in the process. These steps ensure that the review produces valid results capable of providing a useful basis for informing policy, clinical practice, and future research.

5. Munn, Z., et al. (2014). "JBI's systematic reviews: data extraction and synthesis." American Journal of Nursing 114(7): 49-54

This article is the fifth in a series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to describe how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time. This article details the data extraction and data synthesis stages, with an emphasis on conducting a meta-analysis of quantitative data.

6. Robertson-Malt, S. (2014). "Presenting and interpreting findings." American Journal of Nursing 114(8): 49-54.

This article is the sixth and last in a series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to describe how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time. This article details what should be included when presenting the findings of a systematic review to ensure they can be translated into clinical practice.

CASP-tjeklisterne (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) er udarbejdet af National Health Service i England (NHS)
AMSTAR 2
Centre for Evidence based managment
JBIs critical appraisal tool

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73.
Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141-6.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143.